The Prosecutor, after his long speech, proposed the guilt of the accused for the murder of her husband at noon on December 8, 2014, in Koilada of Argolida.
He insisted on involving a third person and described her as a “very tough woman, a woman who does not bend, who did not regret a married life – a time bomb that was a matter of time to explode”.
According to the Prosecutor, the testimonies showed that the accused had “another nature involved in the case”. He specifically said:
“In the pants of the uniform there is a blood sample of Mrs. Thanassis Lambros and another person. The Police had this before the lady apologized. The most critical are the nails. Three people are involved and this was seen in the nails and other elements that she says. How is the third person justified when the accused has said that they met the day before with her husband? There is also blood on the nails. The report of the laboratory, on the first page, showed that she was the accused and in fact states that the contact was more recent. from what the accused claims. This blood means that there was contact, fight, fight. “
The prosecutor then referred to the confession of the captain’s wife who refused to sign:
“She told the interrogator something else. Maybe she remembered better and then she didn’t want to sign this text – a confession. This smart woman who was returning to the channels did not understand that he was a prosecutor and even with vermouth. If possible! That she refused to sign. Doesn’t it mean that the confession is not valid. Can someone turn the gun on him? Yes, he can shoot himself, but here are many of the lady’s many facts. Suicide cases do not involve a third person. The space is not cleaned, the calyxes and the fingerprints. There are no clothes, no nails and no knives. These are carvings of perpetrators, accomplices. Apparently, someone else intervened in the area “, he said characteristically and continued referring to what happened during the critical hours in the friendly house where the victim was found:
“From 11 to 2 onwards, the lady has no alibi, even if her relatives say they are looking to save her. There is a third person, I repeat. This lady has nothing to say. I will not stand if she cried or not. He made the deceased cry. I will dwell on the fact that she has no alibi. 1.15 – 1.20 the victim disappears. She herself does not tell the truth. The false prosecutor, the police liars, just to say to each other a meeting of persons. She has killed him, she has expelled him from her. She did not weep for him. Perhaps the insult that there was another woman was the motive. The lady did not regret it. She did not weep for him and did not regret her deed. The lady did not have a single false alibi. And no one was able to help her in this alibi. It was intense to hide the motivation, the two keys. This is a false scenario. The bullets disappear. The pistol was wiped. “
The unfortunate captain Thanasis Lambrou
The hearing will continue on July 15 with the speeches of the lawyers and possibly the announcement of the court decision.
See details of the case HERE
Leave a Reply